Posted by I call on 11/7/2009, 12:12 am, in reply to "Re: Glen Beck"
bull S*#t on you friend. If you are not able to separate opinion and supposition from reporting, that is a problem that some ammount of education may help you with.
You are a democrat. You can pretend not to be, but you are. Obviously Beck needs to entertain and sell the show, they all do (not PBS of course, I pay for that crap). Offering an opinion is not lying. Reporting something as fact when it may not be, or isn't, is at the very least sloppy, and at worst, lying.
Again, if you can't tell the difference, your problem. At least with Beck, he tells you he is a commentator. Mr. "I get a tingly sensation when Obama talks" pretends to be a reporter and is not.
You are suggesting that any conservative commentator is a liar for offering an opinion? You have not yet provided 20 or so examples of actual, verifiable, lies in reporting.
If, as you say, me or the others here have our heads up FOX's ass, is that a lie or an opinion from you? I bet you would say opinion. Ever heard of an editorial?
If I call you a person who thinks a democrat like dooley is the shit, is that a fact?
or an opinion?
You are obviously an Obama fan.
Remember, "99.999 percent" of everything Beck says is a lie. Right? I think you have a way to go. Hell, I think you havn't started yet.
Who the hell are Art Bell and George Noory? If they are examples of what is bad, how do you know who they are. Seriously, who are they?
Responses: