agreed, but ...

Posted by John Mc on 3/4/2012, 11:51 am, in reply to "If you never read the background to Barrett's story, his solo album aren't that weird or crazy"
68.58.23.21

His story is so well-known that it's almost impossible for somebody to hear those albums without knowing the background. It's likewise almost impossible to separate the contents of the albums from his mental state at the time.

---

Message Thread Just now started looking at some of the reader comments this month - Nolol 3/1/2012, 1:06 pm Yes, because the first name that leaps to mind when you speak of rock'n'roll is Syd Barrett (nt) - Mod Lang 3/1/2012, 2:48 pm Why not? - Trung 3/2/2012, 12:53 am There's a difference between "rock" and "rock 'n' roll" - Nolol 3/2/2012, 1:33 am Re: There's a difference between "rock" and "rock 'n' roll" - Trung 3/2/2012, 1:50 am why isn't "Red" considered a rock and roll album? (nt) - Trung 3/2/2012, 1:51 am Re: There's a difference between "rock" and "rock 'n' roll" - John Mc 3/2/2012, 8:07 am This (nt) - Nolol 3/2/2012, 12:10 pm Re: There's a difference between "rock" and "rock 'n' roll" - Trung 3/2/2012, 4:51 pm po-tay-to po-tah-to - Howard the Duck 3/3/2012, 12:57 am ELP: You gotta see the show It's a dynamo, You gotta see the show It's rock and roll - Trung 3/4/2012, 4:56 pm Re: ELP: You gotta see the show It's a dynamo, You gotta see the show It's rock and roll - John Mc 3/4/2012, 6:34 pm Re: Just now started looking at some of the reader comments this month - John Mc 3/1/2012, 4:18 pm Fear not - Nolol 3/1/2012, 4:23 pm If you never read the background to Barrett's story, his solo album aren't that weird or crazy - Trung 3/3/2012, 11:31 pm agreed, but ... - John Mc 3/4/2012, 11:51 am « Back to index

---

Post a Response