Posted by Anton J on 3/21/2012, 9:48 am, in reply to "Well spill the beans then"
83.187.159.78
I wouldn't read John's reviews if I already knew what ratings he'd give. I mean, he's a crap writer (sorry John, but you know it's the truth).
--Previous Message--
: Really, amateur review sites is really a more
: public equivalent of telling people about
: your taste in music. Sort of showing someone
: your collection and then personally
: recommending the highlights of the
: collection. The difference is just the
: greater detail explaining why you rate the
: album highly.
:
: Really who has a top 5 band and then
: deliberately keep the make up of your
: favourtie artist a secret to be announced to
: at a later date. Isn't the first thing you
: tell people your recommendations are the
: bands you like the best so that people rush
: out and give the album a listen? (which
: makes me wonder, is there a logic behind the
: sequencing of the itinerary?)
:
: The mystery really should be the reasoning
: behind the the band rating rather than the
: band rating itself.
:
: I mean Nolol has already declared his 15/15
: albums already on this board even though he
: hasn't reach those albums in his
: chronological reviews.
:
: --Previous Message--
: These threads are hilarious. I can't believe
: you people bite at my self-indulgent vague
: spoiler posts.
:
: I'm not complaining, mind you, but I laugh
: when I see them.
:
:
:
Message Thread | Skip to this response ↓
« Back to index