Re: Wasn't the 55 A LOT heavier

Posted by dan on 11/27/2009, 7:00 pm, in reply to "Re: Wasn't the 55 A LOT heavier"
72.185.232.174

dosent really matter but for the record it was at 3550lbs. with a PLATE FROM SPEEDTECH OVER 5 YRS. AGO GONE!!!!!!!!!

---

Message Thread: bye bye racing - chris 11/22/2009, 12:16 pm Re: bye bye racing - fishhook2442 11/23/2009, 5:22 pm BYE-BYE RACING - DAVE 67 11/23/2009, 10:23 pm Re: BYE-BYE RACING - Jonesy 11/26/2009, 5:47 pm Re: BYE-BYE RACING - DAVE 67 11/27/2009, 12:16 am Wasn't the 55 A LOT heavier - RESULTS ARE DECEVING 11/27/2009, 8:26 am Re: Wasn't the 55 A LOT heavier - dave 67 11/27/2009, 6:17 pm Re: Wasn't the 55 A LOT heavier - DAVE 67 11/27/2009, 8:34 am Re: Wasn't the 55 A LOT heavier - dan 11/27/2009, 7:00 pm Re: Wasn't the 55 A LOT heavier - DAVE 67 11/27/2009, 7:39 pm Re: Wasn't the 55 A LOT heavier - Tippy Blanks 11/28/2009, 7:50 am Re: Wasn't the 55 A LOT heavier - yo duh 11/28/2009, 7:41 pm HAY NO NAME PUSS - DAVE 67 11/29/2009, 10:53 am Re: HAY NO NAME PUSS - Tippy Blanks 11/30/2009, 4:36 pm Re: HAY NO NAME PUSS - DAVE 67 11/30/2009, 5:45 pm Re: HAY NO NAME PUSS - Tippy Blanks 12/1/2009, 7:03 pm Re: HAY NO NAME PUSS - DAVE 67 12/1/2009, 11:28 pm Re: HAY NO NAME PUSS - chris 12/2/2009, 11:43 pm « Back to thread

---

Post a Response

If you're not going fast..you can't be happy!