Posted by Leo on 3/29/2008, 11:35 pm
Message modified by user Leo 3/30/2008, 12:16 am
1. The Antiochian Archdiocese of Australia, New Zealand, and now apparently the Philippines also ... announces "agreement in principles" to receive approx. 6,000 people from two denominations in the Philippines, one "Evangelical" and the other sounds to me 'independent Catholic.' Looks like this will about double their number of parishes/missions. I wonder if they have a Gillquist coming in too?! (I can't wait for the book!) Speaking of which, for comparative purposes, the original wave of Evangelical Orthodox into the Antiochian Archd. of North America consisted of 'just' 2,000 people in 17 parishes; if this one goes through, it'll be three times the people and twice the parishes! In 1987 our AOA had 117 parishes; today Australia's AOA has about 35! It's taken our AOA 20 years to double its parishes; these guys have done it with the stroke of a pen!!!
Of course, C'ople claims the Philippines as part of its "Southeast Asia" mission....
2. In case anyone besides myself was wondering how Indonesia ended up with two jurisdictions - EP and ROCOR - this rather gossipy notice is the only info I can find on it: 'the language issue.' (NB: The article presumes a ROCOR still marginalized from "canonical" Orthodoxy, back then in 2005, which of course was remedied last May when ROCOR and the Moscow Patriarchate reconciled. Also, speaking of language and other "incarnational missiology" issues, I really recommend the interview linked from that page at http://www.orthodox.cn/news/050331indonesia_en.htm.)
3. Here's an Orthodox Unity idea for mission lands (not ours though, not right away anyway!) AND the too-high walls among the Patriarchates and Autocephalous Churches "back east": A Joint Mission Board. Among U.S. Protestants, cooperation in missions was often a first or second step (along with joint Sunday-School curriculum boards) towards denominational mergers/unity - not catch-as-catch-can like our OCMC or SCOBA, but Mission Boards consisting of leaders from each denomination, ie, different Baptist groups, or different Methodist groups, or different Lutheran groups, etc. What I thought of was placing nearly all missions in south and east Asia and the Pacific Islands under a Ruling 'quasi-synod' of the Patriarchs and Autocephalous Primates (or their representatives), as well as the Ruling Hierarchs in these mission lands, in a Cooperative Model rather than the classic Competition Model. This could accomplish a few things:
By evoking Protestant mission boards I'm not aiming at some new permanent worldwide OC structure higher than the Patriarchate or Auto. Church ... just bringing us all back a little closer together in practical terms. We sure don't need a Western-style pope, or even a committee of 15 popes disenfranchising the rest of the Orthodox Episcopate!
Also, ISTM that countries to exclude from this model would be those where, at least for now, mission depends very much on a particular single government-to-government relationship, like the Russian Federation with Mainland China or with North Korea. Also Japan, which already has a sizeable Orthodox Church of its own.
Sincerely,
Leo
Responses: