Posted by George D. Karcazes
(George D Karcazes) on 4/3/2008, 2:11 pm, in reply to "Re: Discretion and denial cannot overcome demographics."
Harry,
Let's see if I got this straight:
A. The goal is to have enough bishops so that they each have smaller territories to oversee, so that they will all "recognize the faces of the priest's family" as well as "their spouses and parents".
B. At least since 1950 there have not been enough eligible, let alone worthy candidates to accomplish this.
C. [according to another poster] Elevating qualified married priests to bishops is not a solution because their frequent travels would place too great a burden on their families.
So, we have a problem with no solution wherein you "don't see much in the way of anything good coming from folk calling for anything at all, no matter how correct, or for how long."
Let me offer the following thoughts:
1. If all of the Orthodox in North America were administratively united under a single synod of canonical bishops it is at least possible to reallign boundaries of dioceses so that the territories each bishop would have to oversee would be less "imperial sized". Among the other benefits of Unity there might also be an overall increase in the numbers of available and qualified candidates, as well as at least the possibility of formulating better, uniform and transparent screening methods.
2. If the territories assigned to each bishop were smaller, the bishops would be closer to their parishes, they would know who their priest's families are, recognize their children, spouses and parents and have less need to travel, so that at least one objection to having married bishops would be overcome.
I offer these thoughts in an attempt to light a candle rather than simply cursing the darkness.
It seems to me that working for Orthodox Unity and for transparency and accountability in Church governance is better than just complaining about the "system". Those who want to be part of the solution can join OCL by going to ocl.org.
Regards,
George
Responses: