St. Andrew House Discussion Forum
[ Post a Response | St. Andrew House Discussion Forum ]

"We have concluded that when the principle of phyletism (i.e. ecclesiastical nationalism) is juxtaposed with the teaching of the Gospel and the constant practice of the Church, it is not only foreign to it, but also completely opposed, to it. We decree the following in the Holy Spirit: 1. We reject and condemn racial division, that is, racial differences, national quarrels and disagreements in the Church of Christ, as being contrary to the teaching of the Gospel and the holy canons of our blessed fathers, on which the holy Church is established and which adorn human society and lead it to Divine piety. 2. In accordance with the holy canons, we proclaim that those who accept such division according to races and who dare to base on it hitherto unheard-of racial assemblies are foreign to the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church and are real schismatics." Constantinople...1872
* Pray and Work for Orthodox Unity in North America!!! * Welcome to the St. Andrew House Discussion Forum * Visit our Home Page at www.orthodoxdetroit.com

    Evolutionary Church development and unity

    Posted by Leo on 11/23/2008, 9:47 pm

    I just learned something I didn't know, that might shed light on the road ahead for Orthodox Unity, if it can be facilitated to happen: The OCA's territorial dioceses 'evolved' into existence, weren't 'legislated' all at once. The (incomplete) chronology is included in this book, a small, pretty, and informative 'coffee-table-book' from 1994's traveling Anchorage, Alaska, Museum of History and Art bicentennial exhibit of Orthodoxy in Alaska, North America, and Siberia:

    1870: In view of U.S. sovereignty in Alaska, the Holy Synod {of Russia} creates the Diocese of Alaska and the Aleutian Islands.

    1900: Holy Synod in Russia changes the name of the Diocese of Alaska and the Aleutian Islands to "Aleutian Islands and North America."

    1903: Alaska becomes {an auxiliary see} within the Diocese of the Aleutian Islands and North America and Bishop Innocent (Pustynsky) is named vicar bishop.

    1916: {An auxiliary see} for Canada is created and Alexander (Nemolovsky) is consecrated {vicar} bishop.

    1922: ...Creation of the Diocese of Chicago and consecration of Priest Theodore Pashkovsky as Bishop Theophilus.

    1926: Creation of the Diocese of Canada and consecration (in Belgrade) of Archimandrite Arseny as Bishop of Winnipeg.

    1927: ...Creation of the Diocese of San Francisco and consecration of Archimandrite Alexy (Panteleev) as bishop.

    1928: Creation of Diocese of Detroit and consecration of Archimandrite Paul (Gavrilov) as bishop.

    1929: Metropolitan Platon, as {Primate} of All America and Canada, on authority of the All-American Church {Sobor}, proclaims the Church in North America to be the North American Metropolitan District.

    1933: Creation of the Diocese of Pittsburgh; Archimandrite Benjamin (Basalyga) is consecrated; he is the first American-born bishop in America.

    1935: {Auxiliary see} created for Boston and consecration of Makary (Michael Iljinsky) as bishop.

    1946: Bishop Benjamin of Pittsburgh is sent to Japan to assume the leadership of the Japanese Orthodox Church, which is placed under the spiritual protection of the North American Metropolia after World War II.

    1951: {Auxiliary see} created for Washington, D.C. and consecration of Archimandrite Jonah as bishop.

    1972: The Exarchate of Mexico is established to care for Mexicans received into Orthodoxy. Archimandrite Jose (Cortes y Olmos) is consecrated Bishop of Mexico City, Exarch and Auxiliary Bishop of Mexico.

    1978: The Diocese of the South is established.

    1980: ...Creation of the Diocese of Washington, D.C. and transfer of the Metropolitan's see from New York to Washington, D.C.

    So maybe as it becomes possible for some clusters of parishes / regions to accept / receive a single bishop regardless of ethnicity (theirs or his), they can be set-off first ad experimentum as territorial auxiliary sees or episcopal vicariates, and when they're ready, full dioceses. Maybe as auxiliaries / vicariates, they could nominally have as their Ruling Hierarch the Chairman of SCOBA / "President" of "Assembly of Bishops", with the understanding that they'll actually be ruled collaboratively by all the jurisdictions / ethnicities involved, with nobody steamrolled or Hellenized / Russified / "Americanized" (whatever that means!) against their will. And maybe as full dioceses, since no Orthodox diocese is supposed to stand alone, they can have as their de facto synod, SCOBA / the "Assembly of Bishops."

    --Leo


    Responses:

    • There are no responses to this message.

* Pray and Work for Orthodox Unity in North America!!! * St. Andrew House announces Agreement to fund Orthodox Unity effort for years to come - see www.orthodoxdetroit.com * Welcome to the St. Andrew House Discussion Forum * Coming Soon - Orthodox Business Directory * Visit our Home Page at www.orthodoxdetroit.com

web counter