Re: Post-mortem

Posted by hockeybeats on 3/29/2006, 10:44 am, in reply to "Re: Post-mortem"
72.139.30.73

Yes, Peters wanted a trade but did Nie want a trade? I perhaps wasn't clear, rather than saying Peters-for-Nie-for not a goalie, I should have said Peters for Nie and then Nie for not-a-goalie, that's what I meant. Being left without a #1 starter.

---

Message Thread: Post-mortem - hockeybeats 3/29/2006, 12:42 am Re: Post-mortem - tom 3/29/2006, 8:05 am Re: Post-mortem - hockeybeats 3/29/2006, 10:44 am Re: Post-mortem - tom 3/29/2006, 1:02 pm Re: Post-mortem - S 3/29/2006, 8:12 pm « Back to thread

---

POST A RESPONSE