Posted by The Editors
on October 31, 2009, 2:36 pm
It's not a claim, notice; it's a fact.
Eds
US in new push for Mid-East peace
Hillary Clinton was asked why she was intervening personally at this stage
US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is in the Middle East for talks aimed at unblocking the peace process.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8335211.stm
Norman Finkelstein made the point that remains relevant:
"The problem with the Bush administration, we are repeatedly told, is that
it has been insuffi ciently engaged with the Middle East ... But who gave the
green light for Israel to commit the massacres [in the West Bank in 2002]?
Who supplied the F-16s and Apache helicopters to Israel? Who vetoed the
Security Council resolutions calling for international monitors to supervise
the reduction of violence?
"Consider this scenario. A and B stand accused of murder. The evidence
shows that A provided B with the murder weapon, A gave B the ‘all-clear’
signal, and A prevented onlookers from answering the victim’s screams.
Would the verdict be that A was insufficiently engaged or that A was every
bit as guilty as B of murder?"
(Norman Finkelstein, 'First the Carrot, Then the Stick: Behind the Carnage in Palestine', ZNet site, April 18, 2002)
Responses: