Media Lens Message Board: and where are all the questions viewers sent in?

Media Lens Message Board
[ Post a Response | Media Lens Message Board ]

and where are all the questions viewers sent in?

Posted by nicholasm on November 4, 2009, 8:21 pm, in reply to "a textbook example of "concision""

By the way, the BBC HARDtalk website solicited questions from viewers before the interview. I think it pledged to publish as many of those as possible that didn't make it into the show on the HARDtalk website after it was broadcast but there's no sight of that as yet.

--Previous Message--
: The brevity of the interview was also
: disappointing. As one person has already
: pointed out, the show was little over 20
: minutes of which Chomsky talked for about
: half of that. How can HARDtalk claim to be
: an "in-depth" current affairs show
: based on such a paltry timespan?
:
: I think Chomsky refers to this as
: "concision" in the mainstream
: media. The boiling down of important issues
: into ridiculously short soundbytes.
:
:
:
: --Previous Message--
: compared to the vast majority of chomsky
: videos available online, this interviewer
: stands out as one of the poorest
:
: --Previous Message--
: Pity then that when confronted with Sackur's
: "fact" about Taliban-sheltered
: Jihadists from Afghanistan being responsible
: for 9/11, Chomsky only meekly responds that
: that is his belief too, with only the
: proviso that it's "only a belief".
:
: Chomsky could also have metioned that even
: five years after the event, the FBI still
: have no evidence linking Bin Laden to the
: crime of 9/11.
:
:
:
:
: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/27/AR2006082700687.html
:
: There can be no serious opposition to the
: Afghan war without first addressing its
: mythical cassus belli. With his cagey answer
: here, it seems Chomsky may have finally
: begun to understand this.
:
:
:
:
:
:

http://www.nicholasmead.com

Responses:

When all's said, though, it was still a brilliant showing by an old, bereaved man. Shame on the fool - Rhisiart Gwilym November 4, 2009, 9:08 pm

« Back to thread

Post a Response

Your Name:
Your Email:

Subject:

Message:

--Previous Message-- : By the way, the BBC HARDtalk website solicited : questions from viewers before the interview. : I think it pledged to publish as many of : those as possible that didn't make it into : the show on the HARDtalk website after it : was broadcast but there's no sight of that : as yet. : : --Previous Message-- : The brevity of the interview was also : disappointing. As one person has already : pointed out, the show was little over 20 : minutes of which Chomsky talked for about : half of that. How can HARDtalk claim to be : an "in-depth" current affairs show : based on such a paltry timespan? : : I think Chomsky refers to this as : "concision" in the mainstream : media. The boiling down of important issues : into ridiculously short soundbytes. : : : : --Previous Message-- : compared to the vast majority of chomsky : videos available online, this interviewer : stands out as one of the poorest : : --Previous Message-- : Pity then that when confronted with Sackur's : "fact" about Taliban-sheltered : Jihadists from Afghanistan being responsible : for 9/11, Chomsky only meekly responds that : that is his belief too, with only the : proviso that it's "only a belief". : : Chomsky could also have metioned that even : five years after the event, the FBI still : have no evidence linking Bin Laden to the : crime of 9/11. : : : : : : http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/27/AR2006082700687.html : : There can be no serious opposition to the : Afghan war without first addressing its : mythical cassus belli. With his cagey answer : here, it seems Chomsky may have finally : begun to understand this. : : : : : : : :

Optional Image URL:

Optional Link Title:
Optional Link URL:

Notify me by email of all message replies.

By posting, you confirm that you have read and agreed to be bound by the board's usage terms.