Posted by JK
![]()
on November 6, 2009, 7:37 pm, in reply to "For Whose Sake Wear A Poppy? "
--Previous Message--
: It’s a common misconception that propaganda
: must be consciously created. The campaign
: posters for this year’s poppy appeal show
: how good intentions can have deeply
: ideological consequences.
:
: The simplest form of propaganda is omission.
: How can you not feel sympathy for someone
: who has had their legs blown off? How can
: you not pity the war widow left to struggle
: on a pittance? The easiest way of course is
: not to know about them. That's exactly how
: our pity and sympathy for the victims of our
: invasions are kept in check. We’re not told
: much, so we don’t care much.
:
: With the noblest of intentions, one
: consequence of the poppy campaign is to
: elicit selective sympathy. It focuses our
: grief on one specific group of casualties –
: no surprise, our own. Meanwhile the victims
: of our invasions slip further from view,
: perhaps further despised for bringing this
: tragedy upon 'our boys'.
:
: Exclusive focus on our own soldiers is of
: course the current media method of dealing
: with the hell we have made of Afghanistan
: and Iraq. For those who supported these
: invasions reporting their true horror and
: failure would mean admitting complicity. So
: roll on the squaddies, let the tragedy be
: theirs. Rather than the criminality of the
: invasion all attention turns to the plight
: of Tommy Atkins. Rather than failed states
: and piles of civilian corpses, the tragedy
: becomes one of sh
Responses: