Re: Why is it only England batsmen...

Posted by darwin on 17/7/2009, 8:05 am, in reply to "Re: Why is it only England batsmen..."
81.159.220.204

Actually I could just about forgive KP for his dismissal - I wasn't even sure he hit it - but the rest? what were they thinking? As for Flintoff I despair. He should have retired before this series. He is a liability.

---

Message Thread: Why is it only England batsmen... - JT 16/7/2009, 4:04 pm Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - perv 16/7/2009, 4:15 pm Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - Chubs 16/7/2009, 4:14 pm Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - JT 16/7/2009, 4:17 pm Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - Chubs 16/7/2009, 4:37 pm Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - perv 16/7/2009, 4:41 pm Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - Chubs 16/7/2009, 4:43 pm Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - The Leave 16/7/2009, 5:02 pm Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - Chubs 16/7/2009, 5:14 pm Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - JT 16/7/2009, 5:32 pm Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - darwin 17/7/2009, 8:05 am Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - JT 17/7/2009, 8:42 am Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - The Leave 17/7/2009, 9:00 am Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - Chubs 17/7/2009, 9:32 am Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - JT 17/7/2009, 10:08 am Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - Chubs 17/7/2009, 10:10 am Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - Chubs 17/7/2009, 10:25 am Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - Bob 17/7/2009, 11:47 am Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - smashton 17/7/2009, 12:07 pm Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - Chubs 17/7/2009, 11:47 am Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - Chubs 17/7/2009, 10:17 am Re: Why is it only England batsmen... - johnson 17/7/2009, 10:49 am « Back to thread

---

Post a Response