Posted by walter on January 25, 2019, 6:30 pm, in reply to "Re: Right on cue"
Why is it 'outrageous' to say that a moderator that has twice made something up in order to criticize someone who is already in the middle of a shitstorm is part of the problem?
What's intriguing (is that pa? I dunno ) about me asking people attacking someone to explain their position? They hardly ever do.
You think wv is being 'pa' because of the odd mild complaint here and there but he also complained about insults and adhom, something I don't think he does - unlike his critics.
No, I don't think you really read the threads because you resort to generalities - if I was criticizing someone and was asked to justify it, I would - probably chapter and verse.
You said last time his values and mine were 'warped' - and also, you didn't want to get into an argument! That's quite an O-A-R, yes?
I still think you're above this hounding thing and somehow have the wrong end of the stick. I say that partly because you seem to have no sense of scale of the insults thrown and wv and me and anything that comes back (like the others, of course but I don't think you revel in it).