Third, a great deal could be said about this as it relates to the priesthood of all believers in the New Testament. But let me make just one point here at the end of this post. And that is this: it is the essence of the priesthood to help people draw near to God. Yes, you get to go into God's house yourself as a priest. The High Priest even gets to go into the Most Holy Place where Yahweh is enthroned. But whether you are a priest or a High Priest, you only enter the house for someone else. In other words, priests are always helping other people. They are priests to assist others. They are not priests for their own individual selves. The priesthood is about service to others. Therefore, when the whole of Israel is called "a kingdom of priests" it means that the entire nation has a calling to serve, to assist the nations in drawing near to the true God. Priesthood makes no sense without the other that the priest is called to serve. What bothers me about the way the priesthood of all believers is commonly conceived in American Protestantism is that it becomes some sort of authorization for the individual believer to worship by his lonesome apart from any help he may give or get from anyone else. But if we are really all called to be priests, then we are called to assist others in drawing near to God. A corollary to this is the fact that we all need the assistance of others when we draw near to God. So the real thrust of the priesthood of all believers principle is often lost in American individualistic religious thought. Every Christian is a priest comes to mean that we don't need any help from anyone; it's just me, God, and my Bible. Don't tell me that I need help with approaching God! I'm just fine without anyone else's help! If you say that I need help and assistance, then you are subtly introducing Roman Catholic priesthood again in the church. No one comes between me and Jesus. But it's one thing to insist that no one comes between you and Jesus. After all, he is the one mediator between God and man. It's something else entirely to say that I don't need anyone to come alongside of me and help me draw near to the Lord. I'll say this again in a slightly different way to make the point clear: priests always help others into God's presence. That's what the OT priests did at the altar. They didn't inspect the animals, and help with the preparation of God's food to feed themselves. They didn't go into the Tabernacle or Temple for themselves but for others. So if the New Testament says that Jesus is now our high Priest, then he enters God's heavenly house for us. And he assists us in our approach. But if we are all priests, too, in the image of Jesus, then we also enter for others as well. So saying that Christians are priests does not mean that we don't need others to help us into God's house. That's just what priests do! The doctrine of the priesthood of all believers means that we also all need one another to exercise that priesthood in service to each other. The pastor is the one who models that behavior because his priestly work is for the whole community. He helps everyone approach God in Christ. As I explained in an earlier post, the pastor is the servant priest ministering to the royal priests. And people learn how to help others at church. To say we don't need anyone to help us enter into God's presence because we are all priests is a contradiction. If that is true, then no one dare exercise his duty as a priest! The priesthood of all believers means that we don't "go in" alone. We need each other. If this is true, then using the priesthood of all believers to eschew any help from other believers, including the pastor, is to deny the very doctrine you are proclaiming. Rather, we all benefit from the priestly work of others for us - whether they are guarding us from evil, serving us food, or helping us approach God. If we don't need this from others, then there is no need for the priesthood of all believers. Which means that everyone needs priestly service from others in the body in order to find assurance and approach God! I'm starting to ramble (it's getting late), so I better bring this to a close. Let me cap this off by quoting from the Reformed Baptist theologian and historian Timothy George. This is from his book The Theology of the Reformers (Broadman, 1988): Luther's greatest contribution to Protestant ecclesiology was his doctrine of the priesthood of all believers. Yet no element in his teaching is more misunderstood. For some it means simply that there are no priests in the church, the secularization of the clergy. From this premise some groups, notably the Quakers, have argued the abolition of the ministry as a distinct order in the church. More commonly people believe that the priesthood of all believers implies that every Christian is his or her own priest and hence possesses the "right of private judgment" in matters of faith and doctrine. Both of these are modern perversions of Luther's original intention. The essence of the doctrine can be put in one sentence: Every Christian is someone else's priest, and we are all priests to one another (pp.95-96).
Message Thread
« Back to index