Back to Forum |
Post a Response |
Partial Retest
Posted by MARK DUHIGG on September 4, 2006, 9:12 am
|
Re: Partial Retest
Posted by Dave Harney on September 4, 2006, 11:59 am, in reply to "Partial Retest" Dave
|
Re: Partial Retest
Posted by Tom Williams on September 4, 2006, 7:48 pm, in reply to "Partial Retest"
|
Re: Partial Retest
Posted by Barry Rudd on September 4, 2006, 10:57 pm, in reply to "Re: Partial Retest"
|
Re: charging
Posted by Steve Norman on September 5, 2006, 6:49 am, in reply to "Re: Partial Retest" I agree with charging for mot re-tests, as everyone should be paid. But If you are on a difficult diag job the fact is that I find that I can only charge all my time if I know the system, or vehicle. Regards
|
Re: charging
Posted by Mick Partington on September 5, 2006, 9:06 am, in reply to "Re: charging" I often wondered about this, charging for diagnosis, if its a common fault, which you dont know about yet,(and everyone else does, once you find it) If it takes a few hours to find, do you charge them for a couple of hours, or do you charge them for 1 Hr, Also if a common fault comes in,say escort side lights not working, you know 99% its the switch whats faulty, so do you charge for diagnosing, or just for the parts & fitting ti
|
Re: charging
Posted by Tony Gould on September 5, 2006, 11:28 am, in reply to "Re: charging"
|
Re: charging
Posted by Barry Rudd on September 5, 2006, 1:08 pm, in reply to "Re: charging"
|
Re: charging
Posted by Tom Williams on September 6, 2006, 8:31 pm, in reply to "Re: charging" In terms of charging for time taken when we don't have specific product knowledge, we must get some recompense for the necessary research. Tom W
|
Copyright © uk autotalk