Back to Forum |
Post a Response |
4-2-2 MoTs
Posted by Tom Williams on February 16, 2007, 6:27 pm Although many of us are putting our names on the No.10 Petition, experience has proved that government doesn't usually take much notice of petitions. Tom W.
|
Re: 4-2-2 MoTs
Posted by MIKE FIELD on February 21, 2007, 9:21 am, in reply to "4-2-2 MoTs"
|
Re: 4-2-2 MoTs
Posted by John Kennard on February 21, 2007, 2:27 pm, in reply to "Re: 4-2-2 MoTs" I belive that the strongest point of the MOT is it's safety aspect and quoting the article in the Daily Mail 16th Feb 2007. "Although modern cars are more reliable, that shouldn't be confused with safety. This proposal has no safety or financial benefits for any road user." According to government figures (who these days belive them) 3% of fatal accidents are caused by vehicle defects. But currently 29% of cars fail their MOT's. If 30% of all vehicles currently undergoing an annual MOT test fail, then testing every other year will mean potentially half the vehicles on our roads at any one time will not be roadworthy. Is our country in safe hands with this government? keep up the campaign and as has already been mentioned, seek out your local MP and tell them how you feel.
|
Re: 4-2-2 MoTs
Posted by Tom Williams on February 21, 2007, 6:13 pm, in reply to "Re: 4-2-2 MoTs" Politics shouldn't really be discussed on this type of forum, nor religion I suppose, because someone will always be offended. However, this particular goverment and it's policies certainly affect the future employment potential of most of us. Tom W
|
Re: 4-2-2 MoTs
Posted by martin young on February 21, 2007, 8:49 pm, in reply to "Re: 4-2-2 MoTs"
|
Re: 4-2-2 MoTs
Posted by Derek Warwick on February 23, 2007, 11:02 pm, in reply to "Re: 4-2-2 MoTs"
|
Re: 4-2-2 MoTs
Posted by Graham Bullock on February 23, 2007, 11:21 pm, in reply to "Re: 4-2-2 MoTs" Graham
|
Copyright © uk autotalk