Says they're reader/subscriber-funded without ads or wealthy owner so they haven't got that excuse. Unless MI6 are bunging them cash and feeding them stories. I see Nafeez Ahmed is their 'special investigations reporter' so maybe it's not all bad. Agree it's fishy though.
'While the newspaper is not politically partisan, it is not neutral and stands against corruption, injustice and the erosion of truth and the rule of law. Accurate information is the lifeblood of a democracy and, although everyone is welcome to their own opinions, facts cannot be debated.'
Hahaha, pull the other one... Shades of 'comment is free but facts are sacred' - how did that turn out?