The Lifeboat News
[ Post a Response | The Lifeboat News ]
Re: To Adamski
Posted by Sinister Burt
on September 17, 2021, 4:26 pm, in reply to "Re: To Adamski
If I'm speculating it's because the issues I'm flagging up still haven't been addressed clearly (well the key ones haven't). I've already undersold my knowledge for you, no need to patronise dear
- but if it's obvious the explanation should be understandable for the 'man on the clapham omnibus' shouldn't it? And if it's not obvious then it needs clarifying - these are good faith objections - if they can't be answered for someone like me who's sympathetic (having held the same beliefs), then it doesn't look good for spreading the message outside people who already accept it.
(not that it should matter, but i do have a fair bit of experience of coding and computational maths, working with DSP and designing music software (in Max/CSound) - as part of that I've played a fair bit with physical modelling synthesis (eg making mathematical models of physical (and non-physical) musical instruments for sound synthesis purposes), so I'm not a physical engineer, but I do know how mathematical modelling works and I know me way round an equation).