Is BLMGNF really BLM in a real sense? They're just one organisation milking it aren't they - the 'movement' itself is much wider and made up of many independent/autonomous actions as I understand it - this lot who bought the house do not control it in a real sense - though they often just call themselves BLM and claim to speak for the whole movement (and own the web domain) - which leads some to think they do (like this article) - it obviously suits some to take them at their word so they can then dismiss the whole social movement based on dodgy actions of a few people. Bit rum to read the same arguments in wsws as they use on Fox News though - I would have though they'd like the 'abolish the police' bit but they didn't mention it (or would they just want a ML police instead? (or are they trots - I lose track)).