Conviction based on hidden evidence, Isn’t that classic? I mean classic as in redacted document, FISA court, witch-hunt, etc.

I have no idea what he is supposed to have said based on the evidence presented. Maybe I am just a naive idiot, but I honestly can’t even guess. And I obviously ain’t gonna sign in to fricking Google just to find out. The irony is that they just “expect” you would know or be able to figure it out :-) Because…ya know… wink, wink… you should be able to figure out an eight letter word you apparently never use and never hear, from just the first and last letters.

”Hey ”f**********” is good enough for me, because I always thought he was an a********* “ kind of mindset.