You take this one quote “On Instagram, anyone can privately send you something that should be illegal,” said Rachel Riley, a UK-based television host, in the report. “If they did it on the street, they'd be arrested.” and use it to discredit a report or article by two other writers presumably working with or for the Centre for Countering Digital Hate. The Rachel Riley quote that so seems to rile you is just 22 words long, and is the only reference to her in an article which is over 1,600 words long. And you claim that those 22 words discredit the whole article? I have no idea who Rachel Riley is, but is are her other failings that so concern you have any relevance here at all ?

For others reading here, the CCDH web pages include https://counterhate.com/about/