It's funny how this groomer who openly describes his coercive control, manipulation and exploitation of vulnerable young women (well at least one of the Andrews shows off about it in public) doesn't get more push back from the right wing-nuts who scream groomer at drag shows or if a teacher mentions gay people exist (less common here than usa, but give it time).

Or for that matter, over here I haven't heard much criticism from the Tommy waxy-lemon/EDL/anti-muslim types (and their House of Lords allies) about him (I haven't looked though, eww), who so like to talk about muslim groomers (never mind that the numbers per population of British asian/muslim people involved in 'grooming gangs' (group sexual abuse) are significantly lower than white British people) - they probably loves him I would have thought, what with all the macho posturing, the misogyny and the sports cars (maybe I'm being unfair to the modern cosmopolitan boot boy).

No talk about how Andrew Tate's rapey behaviour tells us something about inherent British/american culture, no calls for soul-searching in the western community, or demands for denunciation before a British/american person can talk about anything else, like we often get when a bad muslim person does a bad thing (and like we don't for Anders brevik Dylan roof etc etc).

(Andrew Tate makes it easier for these ghouls to denounce him with his recent supposed conversion to islam while in prison (he's probably just trolling, or has found a new MLM angle), though that's shutting the blame-the-muslims door after the British/american culture horse has bolted, as it were (for clarity I don't blame British culture (or big brother) for Andrew Tate any more than I blame islam for terrorism/some cnuts who do rapes (or Owain Glyndwr for my bus being late))