I'm merely adding a footnote. Craig is good and regularly baited for being so by "liberals", though he does have a somewhat generous "belief" in International law that is quite unjustified by events.

"...There may not be a real threat from China to the UK, but if we 'Feel' they are a threat to our values, then they are.
It's depressing how close this mindset is to a belief in witchcraft."

We used to know very well the difference between subjective and objective: and a good thing too. At one time no decent judge would even think of prioritising someones "feeings" over the actual evidence: well not without showing himself to be utterly corrupt...but now we have the entirely subjective elevated to the status of law with "Gender recognition" enfranchising peoples "feelings" over the hard fact of their biology. Of course in the long term it simply can't work unless you then go on to codify what are the "correct" feelings ... which is I presume why it appears accompanied by "hate" legislation which will tell you which of your feelings are "right" and thus commendable and which are "wrong" and therefore jailable.

-Whoever would have believed that thought control would come in at the behest of Pantomime Dames?