'Public menace'? Can't see how you can justify such an extreme accusation. By not taking the vaccine? By not accepting lockdowns? By challenging government/pharma propaganda on tiny backwaters of the internet? Even if he was 100% wrong on all of it and the official line was 100% correct, he's just one guy with a very limited platform - unless you want to argue that he became some kind of super-spreader as a consequence (from his houseboat??). Anyway you're at liberty to disagree and reveal his arguments as lacking in substance, as many on this forum did, me included, esp when he started entertaining climate change skeptic talking points.

I think you've got your priorities wrong if you're viewing individuals, rather than the governing institutions, as the real 'menace' to the 'public', whatever that word even means any more...

I