Just realised that you were actually criticising my short take on cyrillic/latinic historical divide. Now, focus was very perceptive in initially pointing this out, and I, being familiar with the subject, had a light bulb moment, and further fleshed this out. Any historian worth his salt would confirm that what I said was true. Well, there are small bits one could quibble about .. but in essence it's 95% correct. Unless you either debate it and demonstrate I am wrong, if I were you, I would stay quiet on the subject.