But the whole thing is so performative - why does it matter what one person says about whether a particular act was evil or not? That makes it clear that it's an enforcing of discipline and a way of stifling expressions of solidarity which are inconvenient - or even dangerous - to the ruling elites. Or a loyalty test, as the above paper argued.
The whole framing needs to be explicitly rejected IMO.
Tell your story; Ask a question; Interpret generously
http://storybythethroat.wordpress.com/tell-ask-listen/
Responses
« Back to index | View thread »