Posted by t on February 11, 2024, 9:18 pm, in reply to "Re: Hudson article:Two years old.....worth noting even if very relevant still .n/m " Thanks. I didn't look at the date, but read the article and it sounded like up to date analysis and it resonated. I guess it's the nature of Hudson's analysis, it doesn't age. Fwiw it was one of the references in the MoA for last week. Responses There are no responses to this message. « Back to index | View thread »
Post a Response WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.Your Name: Subject: Message: Please Log in or Register. Optional Image URL: Optional Link Title:Optional Link URL: Notify me by email of all message replies. Remember my name for the next time I post.By posting, you confirm that you have read and agree to the board's usage terms.
WARNING! You have Javascript disabled in your browser, this form may not function correctly.
Subject:
Notify me by email of all message replies. Remember my name for the next time I post.