I think one needs keep things simple - and using the phrase brings more problems than its worth in using. I don't see that be not being serious.
People with the political views of Chloe will be attacked by her political opponents but that isn't an argument not to keep your own arguments to avoid obvious points of attack. You could call this political cowardice, but I think it's just being politically adept. The phrase - the slogan - is not important enough on its own to insist on using it.....
Chloe is able,, but she's young and a bit impetuous.. As a 77 year old man, I rather bridled at her "boomer" interjection in Parliament. She was attacking a whole cohort of her fellow citizenry with that. I don't know if it'll lose her any votes but she does need to take care if she's a pretender for the leadership.
My concerns with the Greens and Labour is their going down the rabbit hole or woke ideology and cancel culture, I consider this problem a serious assault of free speech and democracy. Chloe I believe is one of the worst offenders.
Responses « Back to index | View thread »