As it now stands in the United States at least, a person wearing a watermelon lapel badge or have a motif of a watermelon on any of their attire, including sneakers, can now be construed as an assault against a Jew (Zionist) if the persons feeling making the assault claim are hurt in any manner.i.e., any African American doing some shopping with a watermelon or slice of water melon in their grocery basket can be accused of assault by the latest definitions from the genocide supporting camp.
Given that watermelons have been synonymous with African American's since the days of slavery, given they grow rather well in the Southern States, by coincidence, said watermelon also grows well in the Occupied territories of Palestine and strangely, when cut open, watermelons have colours associated with the flag of Palestine. Ipso facto, watermelons are now an Antisemitic fruit and watermelon iconography allegedly Antisemitic.
The litmus test for the vast majority of these 'faux' allegations, as ever are Police Records, CPS Records and Magistrate and Crown Court Records, particularly those that deal with genuine assault and these paint a rather different picture as far as successful prosecutions are concerned.
One caveat, given in Scotland, one can be accused of Gender Assault or Hate, this will certainly muddy the water, but actual assaults against Jews within the UK, especially those based on hate, are few and far I'm afraid.
Responses « Back to index | View thread »