How could Starmer N O T push Britain towards a (far) more authoritarian future? This is the guy who prosecuted a student called Alfie Meadows for violent disorder.
Remember?
At a demonstration against tuition fees in December 2010, Alfie M, a philosophy student, was assaulted by a police officer who hit him so hard with a truncheon that he had to undergo emergency brain surgery to save his life. . Of course, DPP-Starmer ensured that the truncheon-waving police officer escaped prosecution. His victim though – the student who underwent emergency brain surgery – was prosecuted by Starmer for VIOLENT DISORDER.
After two trials returned inconclusive verdicts, Meadows’s lawyers wrote directly to Starmer begging him to drop the case. Starmer declined, and the defendant was brought to trial for a third time. He was finally acquitted on all counts and Starmer was a NOT a Happy DPP.
Blaming the victim is something disgusting reprobates like Keir Starmer often do.
Thirteen years later – when Labour members had unbelievably made Starmer the leader of their party – Alfie Meadows received an apology and a £ large sum in compensation from the Met for their life-threatening action against him 13years earlier
After the acquittal of Alfie Meadows, Starmer drew up prosecution guidelines that made it easier for the CPS to prosecute peaceful protesters. Starmer’s rules ensured CPS lawyers could take action against any effective form of protest. He effectively criminalised protest- although theTories would need to pass additional legislation to substantiate Starmer’s DPP rules, which he, Keir Starmer, whipped Labour MPs not to oppose.
...no amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party...So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin.
Responses
« Back to index | View thread »
on August 4, 2024, 6:57 am, in reply to "