...or the most useful. Lammy's been given his position not through any brilliance in his part but as a "Woke" " Uncle Tom" spokesman on the US model to take exactly the angle he took: to muddy the waters as a black apologist for what IS effectively colonial supremicism: it inhibits those Imperialism accusations whilst emphasising the attribute in the enemy.
-Unfortunately he's a bit thick and not very well read.
It's like Rachel Reeves as " first female Chancellor" Cheer her for her "Woke" achievement and "breaking glass ceilings" and all that, but she's just a bit thick too with absolutely no idea what she's doing.
-Both believe what they are told to believe which is why they are where they are and neither will achieve anything whatsoever as a consequence.
Responses « Back to index | View thread »