The way he massages the truth, he could be:

Hence the hurt, the anger and the fear that Jewish people have been experiencing in the year since Hamas’s barbaric massacre of Israelis on 7 October.

All of these are possible except for the barbaric bit which looks suspiciously like a projection considering Hannibal Directive. We shall see as the article unfolds ..

.. they target Palestinian schools, the paediatric wards of hospitals, the tiny fragile bodies of children themselves. Even when there are other explanations for the devastation, no one really believes them.

Other explanations? .. for bombing defenceless civilians, predominantly women and children? Head scratching in progress.

Reporters whose reports are proved wrong see no reason to apologise. No amendment of their calumnies. What is there to apologise for? It could have been true.

Wtf is he on about. I don't need an effing reporter as I watch video clips of that murderous scum laughing as they slaughter Amalek.

On and on with lies and insinuations, topping it with:

Maybe the Church of England was wrong to apologise.

Eyes roll, so it hurts. Effing zionist.