as in: 'Agonising reports of rape, torture and brutality beyond comprehension which continued to emerge days and weeks later.' - is this Starmer's brilliant legal mind coming up with a way to still be repeating endlessly debunked zionist lies without actually endorsing them when you look carefully at the language used? The reports were 'agonising', you see - whether they were true reports or not is an entirely different matter.

Whatever, empty suit as R says and worthy victims a-go-go. Predictably sh!t.

jeers,
I