Every article that comes out (in the fraud at least), and thus every part of the "inquest", seems specifically designed to cover a part of their narrative that has had holes the size of buses poked in it. It couldn't be more obvious.

The one person mentioned the least has been the person whose death the inquest is "investigating".

They are counting on people not being bothered, not remembering the details, not knowing the contradictions and then reading these "recaps" and going away with the reinforced narrative in their heads.

They call it "retconning" in television writing; retrospective continuity.