He's the pin-up boy for all the fake journalists at places like the fraudian (in Mangan's review of this documentary she was getting all weak-kneed at how "photgenic" he was and how that explained why his face had to be in almost every shot and had nothing to do with him being an ego-maniac making it all about him and his image) and any shallow, limited hang-out reporting he does is hailed like it's the Pentagon Papers or Assange level revelation.

Here's the link to her "review":

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2024/nov/25/surveilled-review-throw-away-your-phone-right-now

and one of the worst quotes:

Farrow – who does not fade into the background during this documentary, but when you’ve got the last remaining respected and telegenic reporter to hand, you’re going to want to use him

Imagine saying that about a female journalist. And he's "the last remaining respected...reporter"? Really? Get to fuck.

The reporting on this was done much better and much deeper by other people quite a while ago. In "Pegasus" by Laurent Richard and Sandrine Rigaud for example. And the Pegasus Project:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pegasus_Project_(investigation)

who were putting out reports almost four years ago in contrast to the corporate whores who are now wetting themselves about Farrow's high-gloss report.

The subject itself if definitely worth reporting on and he does that...a bit, but it's incredibly shallow.