I thought Professor Marandi was much more persuasive than Crooke who fell into that "4d chess" cope mode that seems to be almost the default for a lot of commentators when it comes to the orange scum bucket.

I thought Crooke was better on the domestic pressure and ticking clock on the hostage deal for Satanyahu but then he goes on about Adelson "not being that bothered about the West Bank" which is directly contradicted by masses of evidence; just because she was dressed in yellow and going on about the hostages which is clearly designed to play to the rabid settler-right in the apartheid state, probably so they will be more likely to join in her West Bank conquest (as if they need any motivation for that).

I can't think of anything too painful, violent or hideous that I wouldn't wish on that murderous maniac (yahoo not Crooke). I hope he ends up being eaten by dogs.

Max's interview with Judge Nap had a better take on donny scumbag and he had evidence for some of the ideas.

Also, Marandi said the truest statement of all during that discussion, "None of us know what's actually going on or what will happen".