on February 13, 2025, 5:27 am, in reply to "Actually, Sir Michael Mouse's contribution was far more astute and reasonable."
What I said was: the original post was three video clips, two of which were (three-year old and NINETEEN-YEAR OLD respectively) celebrity tat which are of no interest to anyone on this board and just serve as clutter, as evidenced by almost everyone else's comments. The third video was barely related to Gaza.
If you can't see that or are incapable of admitting you might have made a misjudgement, that's on you, but stop misrepresenting what I said and why I criticsed the post.
I usually read your posts with the anticipation of seeing something interesting. This wasn't it and it's not even close. This thread has already grown to take up space way beyond the importance of the content, which only serves to illustrate my point further.
The corporate media are complicit in the Gaza genocide.
Never forget what they did. Never forgive them for it.
Responses
« Back to index | View thread »