on February 10, 2026, 5:42 am
10 Feb 2026 · 3:11 AM UTC
https://nitter.net/RepThomasMassie/status/2021059471804596548
Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie
🧵 In response to my posts on X today, DOJ
1) unredacted an FBI file that LABELS two individuals as co-conspirators
2) unredacted a file that lists several men who might be implicated
3) tacitly admitted that Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem was the sender of the torture
video
--------------------------------------------------
🧵1) This is significant because Kash Patel testified to Congress that FBI had
no evidence of other sex traffickers. This is FBI's own 2019 document listing
Wexner as coconspirator in child sex trafficking. It wasn't unredacted until
tonight.
| (Quoted Tweet)
Todd Blanche @DAGToddBlanche
The document you cite has numerous victim names. We have just unredacted Les
Wexner's name from this document, but his name already appears in the files
thousands of times. DOJ is hiding nothing.
--------------------------------------------------
🧵2) Here DOJ acts as if they were justified in redacting the men's names simply
because the document contains victims names. Tonight they learned you can redact
victim names while still publishing the other names, per our law.
| (Quoted Tweet)
Todd Blanche @DAGToddBlanche
The document you cite has numerous victim names. We have just unredacted all
non-victim names from this document. The DOJ is committed to transparency.
--------------------------------------------------
🧵3) until tonight no one knew who sent the torture video to Epstein. I went to
DOJ, unredacted the email, and reverse searched the email to discover it was a
Sultans. Our law requires VICTIM's information to be redacted, not information
of men who sent Epstein torture porn!
| (Quoted Tweet)
Todd Blanche @DAGToddBlanche
You looked at the document. You know it's an email address that was
redacted. The law requires redactions for personally identifiable information,
including if in an email address. And you know that the Sultan's name is
available unredacted in the files. See EFTA00666117.
Responses