Link: https://x.com/Ced_haurus/status/2045608811243684167
![]()
on April 19, 2026, 8:25 am
https://x.com/EuropeanPowell
/status/1964701520349344166?s=20
Louis Mosley is quoted as saying that Palantir's strategy for entry into the British health industry was to "Buy our way in" by acquiring smaller rival companies with existing relationships with the NHS in ord
Palantir has secured 24 distinct contracts with UK public institutions. However, when including contract extensions, amendments, and follow-on agreements, the total rises to over 34 across sectors like defense, healthcare, and local government.
The overall value of these deals is estimated at £910 million (and full £1.5B partnership potential).
Palantir’s 24th contract with UK public institutions was procured with Kier Starmer’s backing, this is the most recent contract, and it is with Coventry City Council. Palantir are embedding its spytech from the top down to local governance levels.
This is how you build a panopticon of constant 24/7 surveillance as per Shabana Mahmood’s plans.
https://europeanpowell.substack.com/p/the-mosley-n
ame-returns-to-british": https://x.com/EuropeanPowell/status/2045760225425121706
Palantir has just published its manifesto. Read it.
Not for what it says about tech. For what it says about politics. About Karp and Thiel's ideology. About war. About you.
When a private company sets itself the mission of defining who must be surveilled, targeted, predicted, neutralized, and simultaneously publishes a text explaining why contesting that would be civilizational weakness, we're no longer in corporate strategy. We're in the privatization of sovereignty. The right to decide on the enemy—which has always been the founding political gesture of States—is being bought up by a company listed on Nasdaq.
This manifesto rests on a single sleight of hand, repeated in twenty different forms: making the inevitable out of what is actually a choice. AI weapons? They'll be built anyway, so it might as well be us.
Algorithmic surveillance? Geopolitical reality demands it.
The rearmament of the West, the hierarchy of cultures, the disqualification of pluralism as dangerous naivety? Simple lucidity in the face of the world as it is.
This is ideology at its finest: not forbidding the question, but rendering it indecent.
What Palantir calls realism is in fact a radically philosophical decision: conflict is the world's permanent truth, democratic deliberation is a fragility that the adversary will exploit, and a private technological elite is better placed than a people to draw the consequences of that truth.
It's Schmittianism in a hoodie. It's literally the structure of their thinking.
The danger isn't that they're mad. The danger is that they're rich, coherent, and already inside the States. Palantir isn't knocking on governments' doors to sell a tool. It arrives with a complete cosmology: here's how the world works, here are your enemies, here's why you can't afford to debate, and here's our contract.
Palantir is the enemy of peoples and of democracy. What they're building is a technocratic power that no one has elected and no one will be able to overthrow.":
"
Responses
« Back to index | View thread »