Discusses Marcie Smith at some length. Seems to be suggesting Smith is or may be anti non-violence. But she stresses in that interview with Blumenthal that she is certainly not anti non-violence and advocates the non-violence of Martin Luther King Jr rather than Sharp's.

I only glanced at it. It's very long.

https://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/nvcritique/Brown2020.pdf

The second part of Marcie Smith's article is here:

https://nonsite.org/change-agent-gene-sharps-neoliberal-nonviolence-part-two/

In Blumenthal's interview she said there would be a third part. I doubt that it happened.

Here's a nice little quote from Marcie Smith in a Jacobin interview that seems to sum up her problem with Gene Sharp:

"when supposedly progressive forces triumph, but then conditions for the average person get worse – well that is doing the fascists’ work for them."

https://jacobin.com/2019/06/gene-sharp-cold-war-intellectual-marcie-smith

Here's "Getting Gene Sharp Wrong" by Smith on George Lakey taking umbrage at her Change Agent article.

https://jacobin.com/2019/12/gene-sharp-george-lakey-neoliberal-nonviolence

Finally, Lakey's umbrage

"Will the real Gene Sharp please step forward?"

https://wagingnonviolence.org/2019/07/gene-sharp-cold-war-intellectual-marcie-smith/

That's enough for any insane man to be getting on with.

Smith's message seems to be regarding reading Sharp - read but read with care.
Read loads once at a time when I didn't have a cautious bone in my body and was very impressed.