h/t David Miller

أَبُو عِرْفَانِ پارسی @A_E_P_1979
15 Jun 2026 · 6:25 AM UTC
https://nitter.net/A_E_P_1979/status/2066406600978358558

Now that a "peace deal" has been announced, Netanyahu reportedly told Trump that
Jews won't withdraw from Lebanon.

In this regard, an Iranian analyst on TV said the solution is as follows:
Given that the very first point of the ceasefire - and therefore its core - is
peace on all fronts, especially in Lebanon, and given that the IDF openly said
they attacked Dahiyah with the green light from CENTCOM and therefore the
Americans are part of it, without a ceasefire and Israeli withdrawal from
Lebanon the agreement is void.

Consequently, the best strategy, Vahid Khazab argued, is to act like our
enemies. Iran should sign the "deal" but at the same time attack Israel and the
Americans anytime they do not abide by the agreements. That is, be part of the
agreement but do not abide by it when the enemy does not. In this manner, Iran
should now present a one-week scheduled withdrawal from Lebanon to Israel but
instead of waiting, even if on day 1 they did not withdraw from city X (which
they should have), Iran should attack Israel to show that the agreement is not
up for compromise and must be implemented meter by meter until it is fully done
on day 7.

Such a move would cause back-and-forth attacks for a few days but that would be
far more reasonable and beneficial than signing an agreement and then losing the
overall war. This back-and-forth clash itself will be resolved after some days
anyway.

In this strategy, Iran is part of the deal and has the legitimacy to enforce it
but at the same time has the freedom to attack at will. It is the same strategy
Israel is using against Hezbollah, but this time we use it.