PostScript: I realise these discussions on Zionism/anti-Zionism can get fraught and sometimes it's difficult to know who stands where on the arguments. To clarify my own particular position: I don't think the Afrikaners need a separate state. The greater majority of Afrikaners and English-speaking whites in South Africa are content with the 1994 transition to one multi-cultural, non-apartheid state. There are still vestiges of racism around but it is often exposed in media and taken to the courtrooms. Despite crime and poverty, South Africa is a much better place than it was under the oppressive apartheid regime government - I say that as someone who grew up under its nasty lies, hypocrisies, brutish tactics, incarceration of dissidents, militarism, spy-intelligence-journalists and propaganda.
Afrikaners sometimes claim their own anti-semitism in the form of "anti-Africanerism" or racism but they are always encouraged to ventilate these claims in a courtroom, rather than spout general, evidence-poor rhetoric. Afrikaans-language TV stations, media, movies are plentiful: no-one prevents Afrikaners from full expression of their identity. Only the intersectional Affirmative Employment or Black Empowerment policies block white kids from jobs because they come from previously-advantaged communities. White South Africans - for the most part - have got used to seeing themselves as an integral part of Africa. Those that are unhappy take their money and emigrate to London, Toronto and Sydney. Back in South Africa, opposition parties like BLF and EFF (who've been invited to talk at Chatham House, London) stir up divisive identity politics (wonder why?). eg EFF leader has said "we haven't killed whites ... yet". Many black people don't agree with this sort of identity-focused, divisive identity politics statement which serves the prevailing class and their international friends and distracts from structural economic issues.