Re: We've discussed this to the nth degree before - your pantomime response doesn't answer the question Archived Message
Posted by redadare on March 12, 2019, 5:39 pm, in reply to "We've discussed this to the nth degree before - your pantomime response doesn't answer the question "
Perhaps then I could presume to speak for Keith and myself. One of the very early challenges for JC, was the issue of a "no fly zone" (for that read bomb the s*** out of the mother*******). He allowed a free vote on the issue, bad enough, but to allow that tosser Hilary Benn to get up and shrill for the US was in MHO, unforgivable. He should have there and then knifed him, in the front, and that would have set the tone for his term as leader. Years ago I spoke to a friend who was a stalwart of the anti-apartheid struggle. He had been imprisoned, tortured in a manner that defies belief, and he went on to become Minister of Finance. He was later booted out for corruption. He explained that he had made one very small concession. After that he made many more and they got bigger and he said, easier to make. The lesson seems simple to me. Corby fogged the issue of Assange as quoted above, but that was a small concession. On Syria,anti-semitism, Brexit, back-stabbers etc, it seems to me he is doing the same. His concessions get bigger each time and some of us have lost heart.
|
|