Re: No mud, just facts - Assange was on UK conditional bail whilst the UK Supreme Court considered his Archived Message
Posted by Poster123 on March 13, 2019, 11:48 pm, in reply to "No mud, just facts - Assange was on UK conditional bail whilst the UK Supreme Court considered his "
Perhaps a lack of perception on my part, but only caused by your own confusion/assumptions; the UK Supreme Court was only concerned with the legality of the Swedish extradition request. It had nothing to do or say about the original bail conditions pertaining to the EAW that were set by the UK, and presently being used by the UK to keep Assange caged in the Embassy. It’s bizarre how you can twist this to write: "I expect you will find few MPs in official positions of any stripe to challenge the Supreme Court by suggesting that it's OK for Assange to jump bail" Further, the notion that any MPs would not support the UN panel of Human Rights experts who have demanded that the UK abides by its international obligations by allowing Assange to walk free, after having concluded that Assange was being arbitrarily deprived of his freedom and should be released, and instead insist on this absurd political misuse of the Law to continue the present status-quo abomination, is also equally bizarre. “all I suggested”/ “ I don't know whether JC's” etc… More unverifiable assumptions, freely offered by yourself as possible reasons to explain why Corbyn went silent on Assange the moment he was elected Leader, yet after offering them, you then state that “there is no point in speculating” on them ! So you offer possible speculation for JC, that you say you don’t really approve off, yet when somebody points out the moral bankruptcy of these speculations, you bizarrely throw a hissy fit ! Seems to me that your admiration for JC, which is understandable in light that he’s still standing after all that has been thrown at him, and the hope that he represents, has clearly warped your capacity for rational reasoning & debate, and causes you to excuse clear & obvious immoral behaviour.
|
|