Apart from the nasty, vile, scorn heaped upon Assange by the Guardian; massively, in article after article, year after year, when there was barely a voice allowed in his defence... there's the truly awful witless remarks that they mistakenly think are somehow humourous and a bit of a lark, if one was eighteen and a student auditioning for the Cambridge Footlights.
The conceit of these people is boundless and crass. And nobody is ever given space to '#### them over' in the Guardian. If they really are so ####ing clever, so witty and so right about Assange, which is unlikely as their so wrong about so much else in conteporary life; why isn't anyone ever allowed to defend him? Are they simply afraid their readers would realise how full of crap the Guardian is? Theirs is a ghastly version of liberal totalitarianism that doesn't allow dissenting voices or opposition.