Re: Why Media Lens don't use Vanessa Beeley as source Archived Message
Posted by Tomski on May 24, 2019, 12:09 am, in reply to "Re: Why Media Lens don't use Vanessa Beeley as source"
For me the case is clear cut, there is something rotten in the state ... when good journalists like D&D want to disassociate themselves from the citizen-activists-journalists, afraid to be called out as apologists. Afraid that their credentials will be tarnished. For what? So that their hard drives won't be examined by our best and brightest? Or even worse, that no-body will take them seriously because the gate keepers will point their fingers at them, as the minions of the Deep State tend to i.e. the rest of the MSM. After getting to read the interviews and articles by Doug Valentine, I am aghast that this squirming is afoot in our own backyard. Btw, I am equally critical of Chomsky and Ahmed on this issue. It is not a question of like/dislike, it's much more fundamental ... it is avoiding the central issue. In other words if there is a case to be answered by the Syrian government on issues of bad governance this should be aired, and equally the other side should be respectfully handled. Meanwhile, the silence is truly deafening ... there is no case for answering these fundamentals. It is very easy to see where Eva and Vanessa are coming from just by watching their vids of interviews with ordinary Syrian people ... don't need A-level in geography to see what is going on. Well, we know that the other watched MSM minions are in thrall of our 'services', so careful : ). Daves have shackles and their compassion doesn't seem to be enough to throw these chains away. Ah well, wish them best. Best
|
|