Re: Is there a more odious, condescending media chatterer than Kirsty Wark? Archived Message
Posted by Raskolnikov on May 29, 2019, 10:25 am, in reply to "Is there a more odious, condescending media chatterer than Kirsty Wark?"
Notice how she completely ignores the answer to her question on Trident where he explains that the antagonistic position to Corbyn has been voiced numerous times on the MSM (and he really meant the BBC here I think) and never with a countervailing voice. This statement goes right to the heart of the question that is the supposed topic of debate but Wark just acts like he never said a thing and goes to ex-Sun editor and basically repeats her question. God I despise the BBC. I thought K.A.M. of the Canary did really well at cutting Wark down everytime she introduced a question, of follow-up, to her by framing her previous answer in a dishonest way. The whole thing is hideous though. The hallmark of BBC politics coverage; endless talking points from the host, ignore any answers that contradict them and lob softballs to the guests that will agree with them and let their answers stand as proof.
|
Message Thread:
- Is there a more odious, condescending media chatterer than Kirsty Wark? - Morrissey May 29, 2019, 9:39 am
- Or a more hapless, ignorant one than Stephen Bush? - Morrissey May 29, 2019, 9:41 am
- Re: Is there a more odious, condescending media chatterer than Kirsty Wark? - Raskolnikov May 29, 2019, 10:25 am
- BBC Newsnight asks panel: "Do bears sh#t in the woods?" - MikeD May 29, 2019, 11:09 am
- Uncle Tom Paulin - Keith-264 May 29, 2019, 11:18 am
- Re: Is there a more odious, condescending media chatterer than Kirsty Wark? - Gerard May 29, 2019, 6:48 pm
|
|