Re: BBC: Does Wikileaks matter? Archived Message Posted by CJ on June 10, 2019, 4:49 am, in reply to "Re: BBC: Does Wikileaks matter?" How many times does C Morris say - Wikileaks' dumping of vast uncurated material on the internet - or words of that sort. Why ask a "research fellow of the HEnry Jackson society to discuss this? Why constantly interrupt Stefania Maurizi when she is explaining that the uncurated material was a. small and b. has been useful to journalists since - and failed to bring her in to reply to the HJ twerp when he tried to belittle her reply that there is no evidence of any damage resulting to anyone because of Wikileaks. There was of course no discussion about the DNC and CLinton file leaks being internal downloads onto usb sticks and not hacking as was constantly being maintained. Of course this might have led to what happened to the guy with the access, and was his shooting really uncoonected to the wikileaks material, of course the BiBiC would never get into this! ( https://sputniknews.com/world/201608271044700879-wikileaks-seth-rich-murder-hillary/ ) The piece had lots of places where heavy editing could have been at work - it really didn't flow as a discussion at all, imo. cheers Message Thread: BBC: Does Wikileaks matter? - margo June 9, 2019, 10:31 pm Re: BBC: Does Wikileaks matter? - margo June 9, 2019, 10:34 pm Re: BBC: Does Wikileaks matter? - CJ June 10, 2019, 4:49 am Re: BBC: Does Wikileaks matter? - dovetailjoint June 10, 2019, 6:23 am Enough to donate my license fee & get rid of the TV. Nm - Shyaku June 11, 2019, 4:48 am   Searching