UN Rapporteur's comment Archived Message
Posted by margo on June 23, 2019, 2:00 pm, in reply to "Miscarriage of Justice: Why Assange's Belmarsh sentence is wrong"
Nils Melzer tweeted yesterday: @NilsMelzer "Why did Sweden refuse questioning Assange in UK 2010-15 only to agree in 2016? A torn condom planted as evidence against him in 2010 showed no human DNA at all. This 'false accusation' proving his innocence could have been prosecuted until its expiry 2015." @ConsortiumNews Replying to Nils Melzer "Prosecutor didn't go prior to 2016 to the embassy because of British pressure, as revealed by journalist [Stephani] Maurizi [Repubblica]" @RightYourWong "Let's ask the Guardian. After all they have a direct link to the UK intelligence agencies. Come on Paul Johnson you absolute tool. Alan Rusbridger, anything to say?" @FilmsKupunji "If anything, Assange's case is going to expose what @sibeledmonds has been saying all along, if they (FBI or CIA) don't have anything on the target, "they" will plant it, fabricate it and even set sex traps and the like etcetera
|
|