I should have known re: Bernie v Biden Archived Message
Posted by Raskolnikov on June 28, 2019, 8:25 am, in reply to "How the fraud covered the first Democratic presidential debate"
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jun/27/second-democratic-debate-joe-biden-bernie-sanders Turns out it was all about Kamala "the Cop" Harris. The fraud's US arm (in the form of Lauren Gambino in this report) clearly wants the Clinton 2.0 branch of the Dems to be the focus (Warren [as much as she pretends to be a progressive she is nowhere near, Harris, and Pete Butitggegeigegegeeg) As on Wednesday, the debate lineup reflected the diversity of a party that is increasingly led by women and people of color. On stage, there were three women – the Harris, New York senator Kirsten Gillibrand, and author Marianne Williamson – as well as Buttigieg. The entire report has one mention of what Sanders had to say and it's this dismissive, vague and uninformative two liner, buried way way down near the bottom of the piece: Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist, and Biden, an avowed moderate, represent the two competing visions for the party and the country. Sanders had kicked off proceedings, launching into his classic stump speech, followed by Biden, who began with an attack on Trump. Debates are always tricky things to analyse the media on as everyone thinks "their guy" won but this deliberate blocking out of certain candidates is just what you'd expect from deceitful servants of power like the fraud. Harris played her race cards all night but that will come back to bite her given her horrendous record when it comes to the prison industrial complex and incarcerating the very people she claims to be representing. See here: https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/1/23/18184192/kamala-harris-president-campaign-criminal-justice-record and here: https://www.pronewspace.com/2019/01/23/kamala-harriss-controversial-record-on-criminal-justice-explained-2915888 for starters.
|
|